Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Review: The Best Low-Light Zoom Lens By a Mile
What Is it?
An $800 wide-to-medium angle zoom lens for Canon,
Why Does It Matter?
It's got an aperture at f/1.8, a spec previously found only in prime lenses and unusually wide for a zoom. That means the lens is more sensitive to low light than most high-end zooms, which top-out at f/2.8.
Sigma did an outstanding job making a sleek, solid-feeling lens with great tactility. It uses a material called Thermally Stable Composite, which has a feel that combines the TK of metal and the TK of plastic, with a nice matte finish. The rubber zoom and focus rings are nice and wide, with great resistance. Even the lens cap is well-designed with a rim that lies flush with the lens, and a pinch fastener that isn't a fuss.
In the context of zoom lenses, the Sigma 18-35mm is a pleasure to use. It's a tad on
Wide-open at f/1.8 (click to download full-size image)
Stopped down to f/5.6 ( click to download full-size image )
The comfort of being able to open up that aperture in low light is priceless. The biggest surprise is the performance. You might expect a headline feature like f/1.8 aperture to necessitate certain sacrifices. It doesn't, at least not when it comes to image quality.
In an ideal world, this lens would offer a little more scope at the wide end. 18mm is the full-frame equivalent of about 29mm on a 1.6x crop sensor. That's acceptable, but not fantastic if you are going for really wide shots.
The Best Part
You no longer have to sacrifice aperture size when shopping for a zoom lens. If you are a photojournalist, concert, or documentary shooter with a cropped sensor DSLR, this lens is a godsend.
There's no image stabilization. That one feature would have skyrocketed this lens into must-have territory for video shooters especially. It would also meant a much higher price, though.
This Is Weird
We did notice a decent amount of purple fringing around highlights. This is very easily fixed automatically in Lightroom or Photoshop, so we don't consider it a major flaw.
- We shot with the lens on a Canon 7D.
- We directly compared shots with a Canon 24-105 f/4. In terms of sharpness, the two lenses were nearly identical.
- If you are used to a zoom with image stabilization, you might want to bump the shutter speed up on the Sigma a bit more than you are used to in order to prevent shaky images.
- Sigma says a Pentax mount version is in the works. We would love to see versions of this lens for mirrorless systems as well, such as an Sony E-mount or micro-four-thirds mount version.
Should You Buy It?
In almost all cases, if you have regular need for a serious zoom lens, then yes. Unless you have a niche concern like image stabilization for video, or need a longer focal range, the Sigma is a great replacement for your current walk-around zoom. The price is an extremely reasonable $800 , and there is currently no lens out there quite like it.
Contribute to GizmodoWrite for Us
FROM THE WEB
Bollywood actresses most Googled on the internet
Help father save his premature twin babies!
Top 10 most searched Bollywood actresses on the internet
Help Olympian Jisna prepare for Tokyo 2020!
Bollywood actresses who won Miss India
Help This Pastor save his 4-yr-old Daughter!
MORE FROM GIZMODO
You May Like
15 most beautiful women in the world
Top 10 highest paying jobs in USA
Ad: VIRAL GALLERY
Help family recover from a horrific accident!
Bollywood actresses most Googled in 2016
13-yr-old Ashwini needs help to fight Cancer!
10 Bollywood celebrities with Miss India title